Slavery in Aristotles Works Essay example -- Aristotle Philosophy Sla

Before a weighty investigation of any aspect of Aristotles political theories is under calculaten, we must take a moment to acknowledge that many of the institutions and doctrines he defends have been repudiated in modern political thought. In fact many such institutions atomic number 18 appalling and simply morally wrong. One such institution is bondage. Aristotle argues in the Politics that bondage is just. No argument is needed to conclude that Aristotle do a terrible ethical and moral error in reason slavery. Further we must accept that the argument of the abolition of slavery was available to him as his defense of slavery is in response to critics who claim slavery is unjust. What sparks intriguing debate is questioning why Aristotle defended slavery, and whether there is a disfigurement in Aristotles logic in his defense of slavery, or if it is in fact internally consistent with the rest of his writings on arbitrator and virtue. Some scholars have claimed that Aristotles defense of slavery is a batter shipwreck of an argument. Yet, others maintain that the argument is in fact internally consistent. any(prenominal) argument in favor of Aristotles defense of slavery is not in any panache meant to morally support the institution of slavery merely that Aristotle used proper or unflawed logic in that argument. Likewise any argument against Aristotles defense is not a moral judgment toward slavery by this author. I am only concerned in how Aristotle builds his argument, and where flaws or contradictions may be located. Consideration of the scene of slavery within Greek life of Aristotles time is as well of importance. Any investigation or commentary on Aristotles slavery argument must first begin with the context of slave... ...s two separate, trenchant entities. As intimated above, he more likely viewed them as a duality, that is, that they argon part of one another. They were also, in the larger sense, p art of the life of the household, as the household was part of the polis. However, this duality was strictly one way. It seems clear that he perceived the slave to be part of the attain, not the other way around. But again, this was justified by Aristotles ultimate virtue, reason. To the extent that the master is seen as imbued with superior intelligence and understanding, it was his duty if not right to brook guidance to those less fortunate by birth. It is by chance ironic that the exculpation of the benevolent dictatorship, so prevalent during imperialistic adventures by colonial countries, perhaps found its philosophical roots in the so-called democratic city-states of superannuated Greece.